Revising CEPs

This topic contains 3 replies, has 4 voices, and was last updated by  Stacey Davidson 4 years, 5 months ago.

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #11004

    Jennifer Carroll
    Participant

    As 50/50 Committees are revising CEPs, what are the areas that are being revised? What are the revisions? Be sure 50/50 committees pay special attention to timelines for PGP and SGG, include corrective action plan language, clarify how SGGs will be developed and rated, and include requirements for “late hire.”…This forum is a great place to share language and ideas for CEP development…

    #11115

    What are some of the suggestions on timeline changes?

    #11132

    After talking to our administration they suggested that timelines would be the only adjustments they could see needing attention.

    #11185

    Stacey Davidson
    Participant

    The biggest changes that we will need to make are timeline changes; one thing we’re considering is language for SGG’s to be something like “30 days following the release of assesssment data” rather than a specific date. We ran into an issue this year because our due date for SGG was only 2 days after data release. We’ve also found that we will probably adjust our observation schedules to be a little more flexible for the peer observations.

    Another area we are looking at revising is the peer observer section. Right now, all teachers could be peer observers every year. Preliminary thoughts are that we may revise to put this on a rotation based on teams established at each school, but we are in very early discussions here.

    I’d be really interested to hear from other districts about timeline adjustments/suggestions AND about integration of OPGES into the CEP.

    Thanks so much!

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.